Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars --- An Introduction Programming Manual --- Operations Research Technical Manual

https://ia800207.us.archive.org/28/items/SilentWeaponsForQuietWars_75/SWQW.pdf

It is patently impossible to discuss social enginee

ring or the automation of a society, i.e.,

the engineering of social automation systems (silen

t weapons) on a national or worldwide

scale without implying extensive objectives of soci

al control and destruction of human

life, i.e., slavery and genocide.

What Mr. Rothschild had discovered was the basic pr

inciple of power, influence, and

control over people as applied to economics. That p

rinciple is "when you assume the

appearance of power, people soon give it to you."

Summary

Economics is only a social extension of a natural e

nergy system. It, also, has its three

passive components. Because of the distribution of

wealth and the lack of communication

and lack of data, this field has been the last ener

gy field for which a knowledge of these

three passive components has been developed.

Since energy is the key to all activity on the face

of the earth, it follows that in order to

attain a monopoly of energy, raw materials, goods,

and services and to establixh a world

system of slave labor, it is necessary to have a fi

rst strike capability in the field of

economics. In order to maintain our position, it is

necessary that we have absolute first

knowledge of the science of control over all econom

ic factors and the first experience at

engineering the world economy.

In order to achieve such sovereignty, we must at le

ast achieve this one end: that the

public will not make either the logical or mathemat

ical connection between economics

and the other energy sciences or learn to apply suc

h knowledge.

This is becoming increasingly difficult to control

because more and more businesses are

making demands upon their computer programmers to c

reate and apply mathematical

models for the management of those businesses.

It is only a matter of time before the new breed of

private programmer/economists will

catch on to the far reaching implications of the wo

rk begun at Harvard in 1948. The

speed with which they can communicate their warning

to the public will largely depend

upon how effective we have been at controlling the

media, subverting education, and

keeping the public distracted with matters of no re

al importance.