Samstag, 6. Februar 2016

TheLocalDK: Denmark confirms US sent rendition flight for Snowden

http://www.thelocal.dk/20160205/denmark-confirms-us-sent-rendition-flight-for-snowden

"UPDATED: Denmark's justice minister admitted on Friday that the US sent a rendition flight to Copenhagen Airport that was meant to capture whistleblower Edward Snowden and return him to the United States. "

Mittwoch, 3. Februar 2016

KOPP: TTIP: Wie im Deutschland von Angela Merkel Abgeordnete entmündigt werden

http://info.kopp-verlag.de/hintergruende/wirtschaft-und-finanzen/markus-gaertner/ttip-wie-im-deutschland-von-angela-merkel-abgeordnete-entmuendigt-werden.html

"Das Vertrauen der Bürger in Politik und Medien sinkt unaufhaltsam. Anstatt darüber zu rätseln, warum das so ist, werden die Deutschen gerne abgebügelt, mal als »Pack«, ein anderes Mal als »fremdenfeindlich«, wahlweise schlicht als Nazis. Dass der Volkszorn wächst, weil am Wahlvolk strikt vorbeiregiert wird und Transparenz nichts mehr bedeutet, darauf gehen die Massenmedien trotz ihrer ganz eigenen Vertrauenskrise selten ein."

Commission presents Action Plan to strengthen the fight against terrorist financing

The European Commission is today presenting an Action Plan to strengthen
the fight against the financing of terrorism. The recent terrorist
attacks in the European Union and beyond demonstrate the need for a
strong coordinated European response to combatting terrorism. The
European Agenda for Securitypdf had identified a number of areas to
improve the fight against terrorist financing. Today's comprehensive
Action Plan will deliver a strong and swift response to the current
challenges, building on existing EU rules and complementing them where
necessary. Through concrete measures, it will adapt or propose
additional rules to deal with new threats.

http://ec.europa.eu/justice/newsroom/criminal/news/160202_en.htm

Neues Abkommen zum transatlantischen Datenaustausch heißt "EU-US Privacy Shield"

European Commission - Press release
EU Commission and United States agree on new framework for transatlantic
data flows: EU-US Privacy Shield

Strasbourg, 2 February 2016

The European Commission and the United States have agreed on a new
framework for transatlantic data flows: the EU-US Privacy Shield.

Today, the College of Commissioners approved the political agreement
reached and has mandated Vice-President Ansip and Commissioner Jourová
to prepare the necessary steps to put in place the new arrangement. This
new framework will protect the fundamental rights of Europeans where
their data is transferred to the United States and ensure legal
certainty for businesses.

The EU-US Privacy Shield reflects the requirements set out by the
European Court of Justice in its ruling on 6 October 2015, which
declared the old Safe Harbour framework invalid. The new arrangement
will provide stronger obligations on companies in the U.S. to protect
the personal data of Europeans and stronger monitoring and enforcement
by the U.S. Department of Commerce and Federal Trade Commission (FTC),
including through increased cooperation with European Data Protection
Authorities. The new arrangement includes commitments by the U.S. that
possibilities under U.S. law for public authorities to access personal
data transferred under the new arrangement will be subject to clear
conditions, limitations and oversight, preventing generalised access.
Europeans will have the possibility to raise any enquiry or complaint in
this context with a dedicated new Ombudsperson.

Vice-President Ansip said: "We have agreed on a new strong framework on
data flows with the US. Our people can be sure that their personal data
is fully protected. Our businesses, especially the smallest ones, have
the legal certainty they need to develop their activities across the
Atlantic. We have a duty to check and we will closely monitor the new
arrangement to make sure it keeps delivering. Today's decision helps us
build a Digital Single Market in the EU, a trusted and dynamic online
environment; it further strengthens our close partnership with the US.
We will work now to put it in place as soon as possible."

Commissioner Jourová said: "The new EU-US Privacy Shield will protect
the fundamental rights of Europeans when their personal data is
transferred to U.S. companies. For the first time ever, the United
States has given the EU binding assurances that the access of public
authorities for national security purposes will be subject to clear
limitations, safeguards and oversight mechanisms. Also for the first
time, EU citizens will benefit from redress mechanisms in this area. In
the context of the negotiations for this agreement, the US has assured
that it does not conduct mass or indiscriminate surveillance of
Europeans. We have established an annual joint review in order to
closely monitor the implementation of these commitments."

The new arrangement will include the following elements:

Strong obligations on companies handling Europeans' personal data
and robust enforcement: U.S. companies wishing to import personal data
from Europe will need to commit to robust obligations on how personal
data is processed and individual rights are guaranteed. The Department
of Commerce will monitor that companies publish their commitments, which
makes them enforceable under U.S. law by the US. Federal Trade
Commission. In addition, any company handling human resources data from
Europe has to commit to comply with decisions by European DPAs.

Clear safeguards and transparency obligations on U.S. government
access: For the first time, the US has given the EU written assurances
that the access of public authorities for law enforcement and national
security will be subject to clear limitations, safeguards and oversight
mechanisms. These exceptions must be used only to the extent necessary
and proportionate. The U.S. has ruled out indiscriminate mass
surveillance on the personal data transferred to the US under the new
arrangement. To regularly monitor the functioning of the arrangement
there will be an annual joint review, which will also include the issue
of national security access. The European Commission and the U.S.
Department of Commerce will conduct the review and invite national
intelligence experts from the U.S. and European Data Protection
Authorities to it.

Effective protection of EU citizens' rights with several redress
possibilities: Any citizen who considers that their data has been
misused under the new arrangement will have several redress
possibilities. Companies have deadlines to reply to complaints. European
DPAs can refer complaints to the Department of Commerce and the Federal
Trade Commission. In addition, Alternative Dispute resolution will be
free of charge. For complaints on possible access by national
intelligence authorities, a new Ombudsperson will be created.

Next steps

The College has today mandated Vice-President Ansip and Commissioner
Jourová to prepare a draft "adequacy decision" in the coming weeks,
which could then be adopted by the College after obtaining the advice of
the Article 29 Working Party and after consulting a committee composed
of representatives of the Member States. In the meantime, the U.S. side
will make the necessary preparations to put in place the new framework,
monitoring mechanisms and new Ombudsman.

Background

On 6 October, the Court of Justice declared in the Schrems case that
Commission's Decision on the Safe Harbour arrangement was invalid. The
judgment confirmed the Commission's approach since November 2013 to
review the Safe Harbour arrangement, to ensure in practice a sufficient
level of data protection as required by EU law.

On 15 October, Vice-President Ansip, Commissioners Oettinger and Jourová
met business and industry representatives who asked for a clear and
uniform interpretation of the ruling, as well as more clarity on the
instruments they could use to transfer data.

On 16 October, the 28 national data protection authorities (Article 29
Working Party) issued a statement on the consequences of the judgment.

On 6 November, the Commission issued guidance for companies on the
possibilities of transatlantic data transfers following the ruling until
a new framework is put in place.

On 2 December, the College of Commissioners discussed the progress of
the negotiations. Commissioner Jourová received a mandate to pursue the
negotiations on a renewed and safe framework with the US.

http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-16-216_en.htm

Bundesregierung plant Obergrenze fürs Barzahlen

Die Bundesregierung ist wohl bereit, Bargeld-Transaktionen in unbegrenzter Höhe ein Ende zu setzen. Laut Frankfurter Allgemeine ist ein Limit für das Barzahlen von 5.000 Euro im Gespräch.



BerlinDer Vorstoß der SPD, eine Grenze für Bargeld-Zahlungen in Deutschland einzuführen, findet in der Bundesregierung Anklang. Laut Informationen der Frankfurter Allgemeinen Zeitung soll im Finanzministerium ein Betrag von 5.000 Euro als Limit für legales Barzahlen eingeführt werden. In der vergangenen Woche hatte die SPD ein entsprechendes Papier verabschiedet, wie das Handelsblatt berichtet hatte.

In anderen Ländern existieren bereits Obergrenzen für Bargeld-Geschäfte. Ein solcher Schritt soll helfen, Geldwäsche einzudämmen und der Schatten- und Drogenwirtschaft die Geschäfte zu erschweren. Eine Obergrenze von 5.000 Euro wäre am oberen Ende von Ländern, die bereits das Barzahlen einschränken. In Frankreich gilt ein Limit von 1000 Euro, in Griechenland sogar von 500 Euro.
Noch in der vergangenen Woche hatte die CDU verhalten auf den Vorstoß der SPD reagiert. „Die Geldwäsche ist ein Problem“, hatte der Vizefraktionschef der Union, Ralph Brinkhaus, zwar eingeräumt. „Auf der anderen Seite haben wir schon viele Vorschriften und dürfen die Menschen nicht zu weit gängeln.“ Die Beschränkung des Bargeldverkehrs wäre der Einstieg in eine umfassende Kontrolle der Bürger. „Das endet irgendwann im ,Big Brother’“, warnte Brinkhaus.


Das Bundesfinanzministerium hatte für eine europaweit einheitliche Lösung für die Begrenzung von Bargeld-Transaktionen ausgesprochen. Ob ein Bekenntnis zur 5.000er-Schwelle der Vorbote einer europäischen Grenze ist, war am Dienstagabend zunächst unklar. Als Grund für die Positionierung des Ministeriums gilt laut FAZ „die gewachsene Bedrohungslage durch den internationalen Terrorismus“.

Quelle: http://www.handelsblatt.com/finanzen/steuern-recht/recht/5000-euro-bundesregierung-plant-obergrenze-fuers-barzahlen/12912804.html